IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Callum Cusinato Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1998-09-29 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2015-16 Caledon Admirals OJHL 36 8 7 15 0.417 0.1021 0.1098 0.2869 0.3086
2016-17 — OJHL 29 8 9 17 0.586 0.1437 0.1482 0.4036 0.4161
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2020-21 St. Lawrence D1 ECAC SR 10 0 1 1 0.100
2019-20 St. Lawrence D1 ECAC JR 23 2 1 3 0.130
2018-19 St. Lawrence D1 ECAC SO 10 0 0 0 0.000
2017-18 St. Lawrence D1 ECAC FR 29 4 3 7 0.241
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.11
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.24
2017-18 · St. Lawrence
+112.3% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#40123
Forward overall
#2092
Forward born in 1998

D1 Comparables

Ryan Fitzgerald
NTDP-U18 · 2012-13 · 0.12 PPG
→ Boston College (0.72 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Ian Mansfield
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Army (0.23 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Cédric Lacroix
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.13 PPG
→ Maine (0.28 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Thomas Ebbing
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG
→ Michigan State (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Matt Gaudreau
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Boston College (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Ben Payne
Concordia · 2006-07
0.480 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Tommy Fitzpatrick
Marian · 2005-06
1.208 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Mitchell Herlihey
SUNY Oswego · 2011-12
1.080 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.