← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jack Murphy

Position: Forward DOB: ⚠ Missing — add in admin Country: ?
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 Thayer Academy NE-Prep 26 4 8 12 0.462 0.0928 0.0928 0.2110 0.2110
2019-20 Brewster NE-Prep 26 0 2 2 0.077 0.0155 0.0155 0.0352 0.0352
2023-24 Andover USHS-MN 21 2 2 4 0.191 0.0241 0.0241 0.0463 0.0463
2024-25 Andover USHS-MN 27 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2020-21 Wisconsin-Eau Claire D1 BigTen SR 4 0 0 0 0.000
2020-21 Wisconsin-Eau Claire D3 BigTen SR 4 0 0 0 0.000
2019-20 Saint Anselm D1 NE10 FR 22 1 5 6 0.273
2019-20 Wisconsin-Eau Claire D1 BigTen JR 17 2 1 3 0.176
2019-20 Wisconsin-Eau Claire D3 BigTen JR 17 2 1 3 0.176
2018-19 Wisconsin-Eau Claire D1 BigTen SO 28 4 7 11 0.393
2018-19 Wisconsin-Eau Claire D3 BigTen SO 28 4 7 11 0.393
2017-18 Wisconsin-Eau Claire D3 BigTen FR 13 2 3 5 0.385

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

2%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
68%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#63965
Forward overall

D1 Comparables

NTDP-U18 · 2012-13 · 0.12 PPG
→ Boston College (0.72 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.13 PPG
→ Maine (0.28 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Army (0.23 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.19 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (0.34 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.07 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.27 D1 FR PPG)
0.04 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Nichols · 2022-23
0.200 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Rivier · 2018-19
0.091 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Plattsburgh · 2013-14
0.615 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.