IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jake Mecrones Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2000-09-24 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2017-18 Boston Jr. Rangers EHLP 15 6 4 10 0.667 0.0765 0.0811 0.1503 0.1594
2018-19 Boston Jr. Rangers EHL 2 1 0 1 0.500 0.1155 0.1235 0.2447 0.2616
2019-20 — EHL 34 2 5 7 0.206 0.0476 0.0476 0.1007 0.1007
2020-21 East Coast Wizards EHL 23 5 2 7 0.304 0.0703 0.0703 0.1489 0.1489
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2021-22 Rivier D3 MASCAC — 11 1 0 1 0.091
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.09
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.09
2021-22 · Rivier
-0.3% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

5%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
88%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#43237
Forward overall
#2404
Forward born in 2000

D1 Comparables

Ryan Fitzgerald
NTDP-U18 · 2012-13 · 0.12 PPG
→ Boston College (0.72 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Cédric Lacroix
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.13 PPG
→ Maine (0.28 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ian Mansfield
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Army (0.23 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Thomas Ebbing
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG
→ Michigan State (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Matt Gaudreau
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Boston College (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Ryan Murray
Daniel Webster · 2011-12
0.389 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Kyllian Kirkwood
Westfield State · 2009-10
0.583 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Ryan Pitoscia
Adrian · 2018-19
0.964 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.