IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Mike Brolsma Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1980-05-19 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2000-01 Des Moines Buccaneers USHL 27 2 5 7 0.259 0.1530 0.1421 0.7788 0.7235
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2004-05 Wisconsin-Stevens Point D3 WIAC SR 26 14 25 39 1.500
2003-04 Wisconsin-Stevens Point D3 WIAC JR 28 9 13 22 0.786
2002-03 Wisconsin-Stevens Point D3 WIAC SO 29 11 15 26 0.897
2001-02 Wisconsin-Stevens Point D3 WIAC FR 29 22 16 38 1.310
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.12
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
1.31
2001-02 · Wisconsin-Stevens Point
+977.5% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#35205
Forward overall
#563
Forward born in 1980
#3193
in USHL

D1 Comparables

Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Davey Middleton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Yasin Cissé
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Devan Sheth
Assumption · 2017-18
0.704 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Aaron Leonard
Marian · 2010-11
0.538 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Tyler Zembrzycki
Morrisville · 2023-24
0.440 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.