IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Peter Tischke Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1996-01-03 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2012-13 Chicago Steel USHL 4 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2013-14 Chicago Steel USHL 56 0 9 9 0.161 0.0948 0.0981 0.4826 0.4992
2014-15 Chicago Steel USHL 56 2 17 19 0.339 0.2002 0.1972 1.0191 1.0040
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2018-19 Wisconsin D1 BigTen SR 36 3 7 10 0.278
2017-18 Wisconsin D1 BigTen JR 37 2 11 13 0.351
2016-17 Wisconsin D1 BigTen SO 35 3 6 9 0.257
2015-16 Wisconsin D1 BigTen FR 27 0 2 2 0.074
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.15
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.07
2015-16 · Wisconsin
-50.2% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#9550
Defenseman overall
#1472
Defenseman born in 1996
#3146
in USHL

D1 Comparables

Vince Pedrie
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.32 PPG
→ Penn State (0.69 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
Dakota Mermis
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.41 PPG
→ Denver (0.21 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Nolan Gluchowski
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.40 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.55 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
Eric Sweetman
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.29 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.39 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Johnny Wingels
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.29 PPG
→ Miami
0.17 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Max Resnick
Tufts · 2020-21
0.720 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Colin Fitzpatrick
Saint Anselm · 2025-26
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Hayden Johnson
Lawrence · 2021-22
0.364 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.