IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Sebastian Vidmar Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1994-03-13 Country: Sweden
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2011-12 Malmö Redhawks U20 SuperElit 45 10 7 17 0.378 0.1491 0.1572 0.5205 0.5489
2012-13 Malmö Redhawks U20 SuperElit 45 26 19 45 1.000 0.3946 0.3960 1.3777 1.3824
2013-14 Lone Star Brahmas NAHL 42 9 16 25 0.595 0.2187 0.2141 — —
2014-15 Lone Star Brahmas NAHL 58 35 45 80 1.379 0.5068 0.4697 1.4578 1.3509
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2018-19 Union D1 ECAC SR 39 10 12 22 0.564
2017-18 Union D1 ECAC JR 36 10 20 30 0.833
2016-17 Union D1 ECAC SO 35 14 27 41 1.171
2015-16 Union D1 ECAC FR 27 6 4 10 0.370
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.31
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.37
2015-16 · Union
+17.8% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#7244
Forward overall
#338
Forward born in 1994

D1 Comparables

Shane Sooth
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.95 PPG
→ Northern Michigan (0.45 D1 FR PPG)
0.50 Average
NCAAe PPG
Carlos Amestoy
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.75 PPG
→ Maine
0.39 No data
NCAAe PPG
Todd Skirving
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.80 PPG
→ RIT (0.65 D1 FR PPG)
0.43 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Eric Scheid
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.94 PPG
→ Alaska Anchorage (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.50 Average
NCAAe PPG
Trevor Mingoia
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.91 PPG
→ Union (0.33 D1 FR PPG)
0.47 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

A.J. Shiverdecker
Westfield State · 2007-08
1.208 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Chad Anderson
Norwich · 2006-07
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Danny Liscio
SUNY Morrisville · 2014-15
1.083 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.