IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Shane McMahan Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1996-07-30 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2014-15 Fargo Force USHL 44 3 5 8 0.182 0.1072 0.1087 0.5460 0.5535
2015-16 Fargo Force USHL 59 5 9 14 0.237 0.1400 0.1354 0.7127 0.6894
2016-17 Fargo Force USHL 51 16 13 29 0.569 0.3354 0.3073 1.7077 1.5647
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2020-21 Minnesota State D1 WCHA JR 16 1 2 3 0.188
2019-20 Minnesota D1 BigTen — 0 0 0 0 0.000
2018-19 Minnesota State D1 WCHA FR 34 3 4 7 0.206
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.20
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.21
2018-19 · Minnesota State
0.8% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#16371
Forward overall
#641
Forward born in 1996
#1574
in USHL

D1 Comparables

Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jonathan Davis
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.03 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Emil Romig
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ Denver (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Justin Parizek
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.93 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Developing
NCAAe PPG
T.J. Sarcona
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.06 PPG
→ Niagara (0.58 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Strong
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Conlan Keenan
SUNY Geneseo · 2015-16
1.296 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Coby Downs
Norwich · 2016-17
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Hunter Scanlon
UMass Dartmouth · 2023-24
0.611 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.