← New Search ↗ Social Card

Dominick Mersch Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1998-12-16 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2014-15 USHL 4 0 0 0 0.000
2015-16 Lincoln Stars USHL 58 6 5 11 0.190 0.1119 0.1216 0.5697 0.6188
2016-17 Lincoln Stars USHL 55 11 14 25 0.455 0.2681 0.2775 1.3650 1.4131
2017-18 Lincoln Stars USHL 57 22 18 40 0.702 0.4140 0.4080 2.1078 2.0774
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2022-23 Wisconsin D1 BigTen GR 35 2 5 7 0.200
2021-22 Wisconsin D1 BigTen SR 37 5 5 10 0.270
2020-21 Wisconsin D1 BigTen JR 27 3 4 7 0.259
2019-20 Wisconsin D1 BigTen SO 30 0 2 2 0.067
2018-19 Wisconsin D1 BigTen FR 35 4 7 11 0.314
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.30
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.31
2018-19 · Wisconsin
+3.2% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

80%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
20%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#15099
Forward overall
#700
Forward born in 1998
#1453
in USHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.75 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.24 D1 FR PPG)
0.43 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.67 PPG
→ Boston University (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.39 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.75 PPG
→ Boston University (0.77 D1 FR PPG)
0.43 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Michigan State (0.33 D1 FR PPG)
0.37 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.64 PPG
→ Michigan State (0.37 D1 FR PPG)
0.37 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

UMass Boston · 2013-14
1.600 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Salem State · 2006-07
1.429 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Worcester State · 2023-24
0.769 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.