IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Matthew Steeves Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1997-10-04 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2014-15 New Hampshire Jr. Monarchs EHL 44 14 15 29 0.659 0.1523 0.1699 0.3225 0.3597
2015-16 Sioux City Musketeers USHL 58 12 3 15 0.259 0.1525 0.1565 0.7767 0.7971
2016-17 Muskegon Lumberjacks USHL 58 14 8 22 0.379 0.2237 0.2182 1.1392 1.1110
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2020-21 Notre Dame D1 BigTen SR 12 2 0 2 0.167
2019-20 Notre Dame D1 BigTen JR 29 1 3 4 0.138
2018-19 Notre Dame D1 BigTen SO 34 3 3 6 0.176
2017-18 Notre Dame D1 BigTen FR 13 1 0 1 0.077
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.17
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.08
2017-18 · Notre Dame
-53.6% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#27027
Forward overall
#1235
Forward born in 1997

D1 Comparables

Landon Smith
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.39 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (0.79 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Dylan Gareau
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Clarkson (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Judd Peterson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.57 PPG
→ St. Cloud State (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Conor Andrle
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.20 PPG
→ Army (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Average
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Hynes
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.28 PPG
→ Union (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Ben Aucoin
Southern Maine · 2023-24
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Sean David
Canton · 2016-17
0.800 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Lukas Ciotti
Adrian · 2009-10
0.778 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.