IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Nick Jenny Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1996-06-23 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2015-16 Omaha Lancers USHL 57 2 10 12 0.210 0.1242 0.1195 0.6322 0.6083
2016-17 Aberdeen Wings NAHL 27 2 3 5 0.185 0.0680 0.0641 0.1955 0.1842
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2020-21 Robert Morris D1 AHA SR 24 6 13 19 0.792
2019-20 Robert Morris D1 AHA JR 27 7 4 11 0.407
2018-19 Robert Morris D1 AHA SO 33 2 2 4 0.121
2017-18 Robert Morris D1 AHA FR 20 1 3 4 0.200
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.08
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.20
2017-18 · Robert Morris
+145.7% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#17560
Defenseman overall
#2187
Defenseman born in 1996

D1 Comparables

William Eiserman
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Matt Krug
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Carlson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Dominic Racobaldo
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Marc-Antoine Carrier
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Zachary Vickerman
Southern New Hampshire · 2024-25
0.739 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Joey Pankowski
Lebanon Valley · 2024-25
0.231 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
T.J. Haas
Arcadia · 2023-24
0.167 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.