IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Eetu Selänne Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1997-11-12 Country: Finland
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2015-16 Madison Capitols USHL 48 6 4 10 0.208 0.1229 0.1268 0.6256 0.6454
2016-17 Madison Capitols USHL 55 6 14 20 0.364 0.2145 0.2103 1.0920 1.0708
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2021-22 Curry D3 CNE — 25 7 8 15 0.600
2020-21 Curry D3 CNE — 4 0 3 3 0.750
2019-20 Curry D3 CNE — 25 5 12 17 0.680
2018-19 Northeastern D1 HockeyEast — 18 0 0 0 0.000
2017-18 Northeastern D1 HockeyEast — 14 0 1 1 0.071
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.15
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.07
2017-18 · Northeastern
-52.8% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#30886
Forward overall
#1421
Forward born in 1997
#2886
in USHL

D1 Comparables

Dylan Gareau
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Clarkson (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Kenny Gillespie
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ RPI (0.20 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Landon Smith
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.39 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (0.79 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Hynes
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.28 PPG
→ Union (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Austin Vieth
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.28 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Joel Covelli
Colby · 2003-04
1.042 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Walker Harris
Wesleyan · 2015-16
0.808 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Mike Mikulan
Aurora · 2010-11
0.824 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.