IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jake Massie Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1997-01-21 Country: Canada
2015 · Round 6, Pick #156  ·  Carolina Hurricanes Carolina Hurricanes
Signed Professionally

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2015-16 Omaha Lancers USHL 44 4 6 10 0.227 0.1341 0.1329 0.6827 0.6767
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2018-19 Vermont D1 HockeyEast JR 30 4 5 9 0.300
2017-18 Vermont D1 HockeyEast SO 36 2 5 7 0.194
2016-17 Vermont D1 HockeyEast FR 29 0 7 7 0.241
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.13
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.24
2016-17 · Vermont
+92.4% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

D1 Comparables

Eric Sweetman
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.29 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.39 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Sam Piazza
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.16 PPG
→ Michigan (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Johnny Wingels
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.29 PPG
→ Miami
0.17 No data
NCAAe PPG
Niklas Folin
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.16 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Vince Pedrie
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.32 PPG
→ Penn State (0.69 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Elite D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Shawn Kennedy
Elmira · 2017-18
1.133 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Cassidy Bowes
Endicott · 2017-18
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Taylor Pryce
Buffalo State · 2011-12
0.875 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.