IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Tommy Miller Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1999-03-06 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2015-16 U.S. National U17 Team NTDP-U18 22 3 5 8 0.364 0.2703 0.2750 1.3567 1.3801
2016-17 U.S. National U18 Team NTDP-U18 65 3 17 20 0.308 0.2287 0.2214 1.1482 1.1116
2018-19 Rivers School NE-Prep 25 1 0 1 0.040 0.0079 0.0079 0.0182 0.0182
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2021-22 Northeastern D1 HockeyEast — 39 1 8 9 0.231
2020-21 Michigan State D1 BigTen SR 27 1 3 4 0.148
2019-20 Michigan State D1 BigTen JR 36 2 7 9 0.250
2018-19 Michigan State D1 BigTen SO 36 2 2 4 0.111
2017-18 Michigan State D1 BigTen FR 36 0 10 10 0.278
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.23
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.28
2017-18 · Michigan State
+21.2% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

0%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
95%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#16403
Defenseman overall
#2657
Defenseman born in 1999

D1 Comparables

Kyle Mackey
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.16 PPG
→ Air Force (0.21 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Zach Yoder
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.10 PPG
→ Air Force (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.06 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Lukas Buchta
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.05 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.03 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Jake Bischoff
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.17 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Jimmy Mazza
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.17 PPG
→ Canisius (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Strong D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Adam Lundberg
Western New England · 2013-14
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Landon Steffen
Hamline · 2022-23
0.188 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Michael Stenberg
Connecticut College · 2022-23
0.191 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.