| Season | Team | League | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG | NCAAe-PPG | Age-Adj | D3e-PPG | Age-Adj |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2015-16 | — | USHL | 6 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.167 | 0.0983 | 0.1099 | 0.5007 | 0.5599 |
| 2016-17 | Chicago Steel | USHL | 50 | 10 | 12 | 22 | 0.440 | 0.2596 | 0.2770 | 1.3215 | 1.4102 |
| 2017-18 | Chicago Steel | USHL | 51 | 4 | 12 | 16 | 0.314 | 0.1851 | 0.1883 | 0.9422 | 0.9587 |
| 2018-19 | — | USHL | 58 | 17 | 11 | 28 | 0.483 | 0.2848 | 0.2751 | 1.4500 | 1.4005 |
| Season | School | Div | Conference | Year | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-24 | Arizona State | D1 | NCHC | — | 36 | 12 | 6 | 18 | 0.500 |
| 2022-23 | Penn State | D1 | BigTen | SR | 38 | 7 | 8 | 15 | 0.395 |
| 2021-22 | Penn State | D1 | BigTen | JR | 37 | 9 | 3 | 12 | 0.324 |
| 2020-21 | Penn State | D1 | BigTen | SO | 17 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0.059 |
| 2019-20 | Penn State | D1 | BigTen | FR | 31 | 3 | 3 | 6 | 0.194 |
How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.
Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.