← New Search ↗ Social Card

Carter Ekberg Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1997-05-14 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2014-15 Janesville Jets NAHL 2 0 0 0 0.000
2015-16 USHL 10 0 0 0 0.000
2016-17 Janesville Jets NAHL 31 4 7 11 0.355 0.1304 0.1287 0.3745 0.3695
2017-18 Janesville Jets NAHL 50 5 25 30 0.600 0.2204 0.2066 0.6333 0.5935
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2021-22 Long Island Univ. D1 AHA 27 0 5 5 0.185
2020-21 LIU D1 JR 7 0 0 0 0.000
2020-21 Long Island Univ. D1 AHA JR 7 0 0 0 0.000
2019-20 Air Force D1 AHA SO 21 1 3 4 0.191
2018-19 Air Force D1 AHA FR 27 0 3 3 0.111
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.17
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.11
2018-19 · Air Force
-36.1% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

42%
NCAA D1
10%
NCAA D2/D3
48%
Age-Out / Club
0%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#10276
Defenseman overall
#1702
Defenseman born in 1997
#3618
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Colby · 2024-25
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Milwaukee School of Engineering · 2022-23
0.731 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Augsburg · 2004-05
0.520 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.