IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Coale Norris Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1997-05-25 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2015-16 — NAHL 52 14 8 22 0.423 0.1676 0.1747 0.4442 0.4631
2016-17 Youngstown Phantoms USHL 60 15 15 30 0.500 0.3074 0.2942 1.4731 1.4100
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2021-22 Bowling Green D1 CCHA — 33 10 9 19 0.576
2020-21 Ferris State D1 WCHA SR 25 8 9 17 0.680
2019-20 Ferris State D1 WCHA JR 25 6 2 8 0.320
2018-19 Ferris State D1 WCHA SO 36 7 13 20 0.556
2017-18 Ferris State D1 WCHA FR 36 10 8 18 0.500
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.21
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.50
2017-18 · Ferris State
+137.1% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#21169
Forward overall
#963
Forward born in 1997

D1 Comparables

Brett Skibba
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ UConn (0.23 D1 FR PPG)
0.29 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tanner Pond
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.39 PPG
→ Northeastern (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Alfred Larsson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.39 PPG
→ Merrimack (0.20 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tommy Schutt
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (0.28 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Kevin Irwin
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.56 PPG
→ Vermont (0.47 D1 FR PPG)
0.33 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Kyle Cook
Nichols · 2011-12
1.185 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Jack Billings
Salve Regina · 2014-15
1.381 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Scott Cuthrell
Nichols · 2013-14
0.704 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.