IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Coale Norris Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1997-05-25 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2015-16 — NAHL 52 14 8 22 0.423 0.1554 0.1620 0.4466 0.4656
2016-17 Youngstown Phantoms USHL 60 15 15 30 0.500 0.2949 0.2823 1.5017 1.4374
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2021-22 Bowling Green D1 CCHA — 33 10 9 19 0.576
2020-21 Ferris State D1 WCHA SR 25 8 9 17 0.680
2019-20 Ferris State D1 WCHA JR 25 6 2 8 0.320
2018-19 Ferris State D1 WCHA SO 36 7 13 20 0.556
2017-18 Ferris State D1 WCHA FR 36 10 8 18 0.500
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.20
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.50
2017-18 · Ferris State
+149.4% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#21323
Forward overall
#975
Forward born in 1997

D1 Comparables

Luc Gerdes
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.80 PPG
→ Colorado College (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.29 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Brett Skibba
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ UConn (0.23 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tanner Pond
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.39 PPG
→ Northeastern (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Alfred Larsson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.39 PPG
→ Merrimack (0.20 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Garret Clemment
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.93 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.43 D1 FR PPG)
0.34 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Andrew Bellant
Adrian · 2016-17
1.462 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Conlan Keenan
SUNY Geneseo · 2014-15
1.296 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Michael Hill
Saint Mary's (MN) · 2009-10
1.200 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.