IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Cole Koidahl Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1983-02-24 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2001-02 Rochester Mustangs USHL 57 10 13 23 0.404 0.2380 0.2422 1.2119 1.2332
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2006-07 UConn D1 HockeyEast SR 36 13 21 34 0.944
2005-06 UConn D1 HockeyEast JR 35 12 20 32 0.914
2004-05 UConn D1 HockeyEast SO 36 9 16 25 0.694
2003-04 UConn D1 HockeyEast FR 24 7 9 16 0.667
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.21
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.67
2003-04 · UConn
+221.6% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#21689
Forward overall
#678
Forward born in 1983
#2120
in USHL

D1 Comparables

Mackenzie MacEachern
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.42 PPG
→ Michigan State (0.33 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Mason Jobst
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.86 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Elite
NCAAe PPG
Zach Aman
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Colorado College (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jimmy DeVito
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.35 PPG
→ RPI (0.16 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jeff Kubiak
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Cornell (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Bayley Marshall
Aurora · 2015-16
0.308 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Rusty Masters
Elmira · 2004-05
0.962 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Travis Janke
Norwich · 2008-09
1.258 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.