← New Search ↗ Social Card

Khristian Acosta Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1998-05-05 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2015-16 Jersey Hitmen USPHL-Premier-Classic 25 5 11 16 0.640 0.1796 0.1984 0.5262 0.5814
2016-17 Sioux Falls Stampede USHL 20 1 12 13 0.650 0.3834 0.3851 1.9522 1.9608
2017-18 USHL 43 6 19 25 0.581 0.3430 0.3275 1.7462 1.6672
2018-19 Tri-City Storm USHL 58 7 17 24 0.414 0.2441 0.2205 1.2428 1.1225
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2023-24 Utica D3 UCHC 30 8 16 24 0.800
2022-23 Utica D3 UCHC 27 5 14 19 0.704
2021-22 Utica D3 UCHC 26 4 7 11 0.423
2020-21 Mercyhurst D1 AHA SO 7 0 1 1 0.143
2019-20 Mercyhurst D1 AHA FR 26 4 4 8 0.308
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.23
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.31
2019-20 · Mercyhurst
+36.5% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

45%
NCAA D1
12%
NCAA D2/D3
42%
Age-Out / Club
0%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#14353
Forward overall
#658
Forward born in 1998

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Utica · 2018-19
0.864 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Salve Regina · 2010-11
1.160 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Elmira · 2011-12
0.636 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.