IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jamie Armstrong Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1998-08-07 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2016-17 Sioux City Musketeers USHL 13 1 1 2 0.154 0.0979 0.0996 0.4609 0.4689
2017-18 Central Illinois Flying Aces USHL 27 6 4 10 0.370 0.2359 0.2283 1.1100 1.0741
2018-19 Central Illinois Flying Aces USHL 13 1 0 1 0.077 0.0490 0.0449 0.2304 0.2111
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2023-24 Boston College D1 HockeyEast — 32 5 7 12 0.375
2022-23 Boston University D1 HockeyEast — 29 5 8 13 0.448
2021-22 Boston University D1 HockeyEast — 26 1 5 6 0.231
2007-08 Suffolk D3 — FR 7 1 2 3 0.429
2001-02 Denver D1 — SR 18 0 6 6 0.333

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

2%
NCAA D1
32%
NCAA D2/D3
65%
Age-Out / Club
0%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#28882
Forward overall
#1220
Forward born in 1998
#3497
in USHL

D1 Comparables

Bob Kinne
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.48 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Nick DeCenzo
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ Army (0.32 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ryan Dau
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.41 PPG
→ Air Force (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tayler Munson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Mike Crowley
SUNY Cortland · 2014-15
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Luc Kreuser
Concordia Wisconsin · 2017-18
0.214 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Stephen Collins
SUNY Geneseo · 2011-12
0.800 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.