← New Search ↗ Social Card

Brenden Rons Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1998-03-03 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2016-17 Omaha Lancers USHL 23 0 2 2 0.087 0.0513 0.0511 0.2611 0.2600
2017-18 Amarillo Wranglers NAHL 55 0 11 11 0.200 0.0735 0.0718 0.2114 0.2066
2018-19 Amarillo Wranglers NAHL 60 3 17 20 0.333 0.1225 0.1142 0.3523 0.3285
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2022-23 Ferris State D1 CCHA SR 11 0 0 0 0.000
2021-22 Ferris State D1 CCHA JR 36 4 3 7 0.194
2020-21 Ferris State D1 WCHA SO 16 0 0 0 0.000
2019-20 Ferris State D1 WCHA FR 20 1 0 1 0.050
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.09
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.05
2019-20 · Ferris State
-45.5% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

30%
NCAA D1
10%
NCAA D2/D3
57%
Age-Out / Club
2%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#17566
Defenseman overall
#2612
Defenseman born in 1998

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ RIT (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.08 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.04 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Westfield State · 2021-22
0.296 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Salem State · 2021-22
1.111 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Norwich · 2015-16
0.269 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.