IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Andong Song Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1997-01-31 Country: China
2015 · Round 6, Pick #172  ·  New York Islanders New York Islanders
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2016-17 Madison Capitols USHL 52 0 2 2 0.038 0.0227 0.0214 0.1156 0.1088
2017-18 Madison Capitols USHL 48 1 0 1 0.021 0.0123 0.0110 0.0625 0.0557
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2020-21 Cornell D1 ECAC — 0 0 0 0 0.000
2019-20 Cornell D1 ECAC — 0 0 0 0 0.000
2018-19 Cornell D1 ECAC — 0 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

22%
NCAA D1
8%
NCAA D2/D3
70%
Age-Out / Club
0%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#31618
Defenseman overall
#3442
Defenseman born in 1997
#4256
in USHL

D1 Comparables

Carter Foguth
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.08 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.04 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Michael Holland
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ RIT (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Carlson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Matt Krug
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
William Eiserman
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Jacob Kettwig
Roger Williams · 2024-25
0.100 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Michael Herbert
Marian · 2005-06
0.125 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Trevor Wilhelm
Saint Mary's (MN) · 2018-19
0.640 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.