IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Gabriel Harren Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1985-06-18 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2004-05 Billings Bulls NAHL 48 10 12 22 0.458 0.1684 0.1652 0.4837 0.4744
2005-06 Billings Bulls NAHL 15 2 3 5 0.333 0.1225 0.1141 0.3518 0.3276
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2009-10 Saint John's D3 MIAC SR 25 7 11 18 0.720
2008-09 Saint John's D3 MIAC JR 12 1 5 6 0.500
2007-08 Saint John's D3 MIAC SO 27 9 14 23 0.852
2006-07 Saint John's D3 MIAC FR 15 3 1 4 0.267
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.12
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.27
2006-07 · Saint John's
+131.5% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#39466
Forward overall
#1238
Forward born in 1985
#4166
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Yasin Cissé
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
Will Suter
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Cole Beckstead
Skidmore · 2018-19
0.400 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Travis Payne
Concordia · 2011-12
0.263 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Aaron Hamel
Arcadia · 2021-22
0.652 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.