IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Gabriel Harren Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1985-06-18 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2004-05 Billings Bulls NAHL 48 10 12 22 0.458 0.1702 0.1669 0.4852 0.4759
2005-06 Billings Bulls NAHL 15 2 3 5 0.333 0.1238 0.1153 0.3529 0.3286
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2009-10 St. John's D3 — SR 25 7 11 18 0.720
2008-09 St. John's D3 — JR 12 1 5 6 0.500
2007-08 St. John's D3 — SO 27 9 14 23 0.852
2006-07 St. John's D3 — FR 15 3 1 4 0.267
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.12
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.27
2006-07 · St. John's
+129.1% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#31873
Forward overall
#1128
Forward born in 1985
#3879
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

Bob Kinne
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.48 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Cody Marooney
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jayson Angus
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.66 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Bradley Duwe
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Alaska Anchorage (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Dan McCauley
Bethel · 2004-05
0.667 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Reid Brown
Gustavus Adolphus · 2015-16
0.222 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Don Rankin
Curry · 2004-05
0.682 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.