IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jarrett Rush Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1985-06-22 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2004-05 Cobourg Cougars OJHL 46 5 11 16 0.348 0.0852 0.0807 0.2395 0.2268
2005-06 Traverse City North Stars NAHL 51 5 8 13 0.255 0.0937 0.0873 0.2690 0.2506
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2009-10 Curry D3 CNE SR 28 1 6 7 0.250
2008-09 Curry D3 CNE JR 25 1 7 8 0.320
2007-08 Curry D3 CNE SO 15 3 4 7 0.467
2006-07 Manhattanville D3 UCHC FR 4 0 0 0 0.000

NCAAe Rankings

#16587
Defenseman overall
#1427
Defenseman born in 1985

D1 Comparables

Brandon Carlson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Matt Krug
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
William Eiserman
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Dominic Racobaldo
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Marc-Antoine Carrier
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Matt Goeree
Fredonia · 2017-18
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Kegan Couture
Gustavus Adolphus · 2015-16
0.154 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Noah Roitman
Concordia (WI) · 2021-22
0.308 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.