IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Marc Howe Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1985-12-24 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2005-06 Bozeman Ice Dogs NAHL 40 2 4 6 0.150 0.0533 0.0510 0.1575 0.1507
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2009-10 Lawrence D3 ECAC SR 28 19 13 32 1.143
2008-09 Lawrence D3 ECAC JR 27 14 10 24 0.889
2007-08 Lawrence D3 ECAC SO 27 17 16 33 1.222
2006-07 Lawrence D3 ECAC FR 29 15 12 27 0.931
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.04
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.93
2006-07 · Lawrence
+2030.4% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#55416
Forward overall
#1719
Forward born in 1985
#6423
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

Tayler Munson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Average
NCAAe PPG
Stanislav Dzakhov
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.27 PPG
→ Niagara (0.44 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Average
NCAAe PPG
Ben Ostlie
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Notre Dame
0.13 No data
NCAAe PPG
William Messa
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Northeastern
0.12 No data
NCAAe PPG
Matthew Hansen
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.25 PPG
→ Colorado College (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Dan Morello
SUNY Morrisville · 2009-10
0.458 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Sam Gray
Williams · 2012-13
0.240 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
William Robinson
Fredonia · 2023-24
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.