IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Dan Morello Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1989-12-19 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2007-08 Blind River Beavers NOJHL 37 0 10 10 0.270 0.0385 0.0406 0.1121 0.1183
2008-09 Vaughan Vipers OJHL 49 3 14 17 0.347 0.0850 0.0840 0.2375 0.2346
2009-10 Vaughan Vipers OJHL 55 4 14 18 0.327 0.0802 0.0750 0.2240 0.2095
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2013-14 SUNY Morrisville D3 SUNYAC SR 18 4 12 16 0.889
2012-13 SUNY Morrisville D3 SUNYAC JR 20 3 4 7 0.350
2011-12 SUNY Morrisville D3 SUNYAC SO 24 4 3 7 0.292
2010-11 SUNY Morrisville D3 SUNYAC FR 24 1 10 11 0.458
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.07
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.46
2010-11 · SUNY Morrisville
+517.7% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#18238
Defenseman overall
#1607
Defenseman born in 1989

D1 Comparables

Kyle McKenzie
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.14 PPG
→ Providence (0.15 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Matt Fuller
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.11 PPG
→ Southern Maine (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.06 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Patrick Koudys
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ RPI (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Taki Pantziris
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.29 PPG
→ Brown
0.15 No data
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Kirk
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.32 PPG
→ Dartmouth
0.17 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Lucas Hefty
Concordia (WI) · 2018-19
0.200 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Scott Cremen
Canton · 2022-23
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Alex Lubczuk
SUNY Geneseo · 2010-11
0.640 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.