| Season | Team | League | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG | NCAAe-PPG | Age-Adj | D3e-PPG | Age-Adj |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006-07 | Bismarck Bobcats | NAHL | 54 | 4 | 9 | 13 | 0.241 | 0.0884 | 0.0873 | 0.2541 | 0.2509 |
| 2007-08 | Southern Minnesota Express | NAHL | 52 | 9 | 8 | 17 | 0.327 | 0.1201 | 0.1127 | 0.3450 | 0.3238 |
| Season | School | Div | Conference | Year | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2011-12 | Saint Mary's (MN) | D3 | MIAC | SR | 25 | 0 | 4 | 4 | 0.160 |
| 2010-11 | Saint Mary's (MN) | D3 | MIAC | JR | 25 | 0 | 7 | 7 | 0.280 |
| 2009-10 | Saint Mary's (MN) | D3 | MIAC | SO | 20 | 4 | 8 | 12 | 0.600 |
| 2008-09 | Saint Mary's (MN) | D3 | MIAC | FR | 22 | 2 | 5 | 7 | 0.318 |
How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.
Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.