← New Search ↗ Social Card

Vincent Unklesbay Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1987-07-29 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2006-07 Bismarck Bobcats NAHL 54 4 9 13 0.241 0.0884 0.0873 0.2541 0.2509
2007-08 Southern Minnesota Express NAHL 52 9 8 17 0.327 0.1201 0.1127 0.3450 0.3238
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2011-12 Saint Mary's (MN) D3 MIAC SR 25 0 4 4 0.160
2010-11 Saint Mary's (MN) D3 MIAC JR 25 0 7 7 0.280
2009-10 Saint Mary's (MN) D3 MIAC SO 20 4 8 12 0.600
2008-09 Saint Mary's (MN) D3 MIAC FR 22 2 5 7 0.318
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.09
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.32
2008-09 · Saint Mary's (MN)
+262.4% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#43255
Forward overall
#1419
Forward born in 1987
#4743
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.21 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

SUNY Potsdam · 2022-23
0.360 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Southern Maine · 2015-16
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Brockport · 2018-19
0.625 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.