icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
| Season | Team | League | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG | NCAAe-PPG | Age-Adj | D3e-PPG | Age-Adj |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2004-05 | Valley Jr. Warriors | EJHL | 43 | 2 | 7 | 9 | 0.209 | 0.0620 | 0.0661 | — | — |
| 2005-06 | Valley Jr. Warriors | EJHL | 36 | 2 | 11 | 13 | 0.361 | 0.1070 | 0.1090 | — | — |
| 2006-07 | — | NAHL | 39 | 3 | 7 | 10 | 0.256 | 0.0911 | 0.0890 | 0.2705 | 0.2644 |
| Season | School | Div | Conference | Year | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010-11 | Wisconsin-Stout | D3 | WIAC | SR | 7 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.143 |
| 2009-10 | Wisconsin-Stout | D3 | WIAC | JR | 19 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0.053 |
| 2008-09 | Wisconsin-Stout | D3 | WIAC | SO | 22 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 0.136 |
| 2007-08 | Wisconsin-Stout | D3 | WIAC | FR | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.000 |
How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.
Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.