← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jack Hughes Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2001-05-14 Country: USA
2022 NHL Draft Round 2, Pick #51  ·  Los Angeles Kings Los Angeles Kings
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2016-17 OJHL 0 0 0 0 0.000
2017-18 NTDP-U18 60 40 76 116 1.933 1.4991 1.5393 7.1955 7.3885
2018-19 NTDP-U18 50 34 78 112 2.240 1.7369 1.6949 8.3371 8.1354
2019-20 Dexter NE-Prep 30 1 5 6 0.200 0.0564 0.0564 0.0915 0.0915
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2024-25 Boston University D1 HockeyEast 40 7 18 25 0.625
2023-24 Boston University D1 HockeyEast 38 7 12 19 0.500
2022-23 Northeastern D1 HockeyEast 32 5 11 16 0.500
2021-22 Northeastern D1 HockeyEast 39 7 9 16 0.410
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.66
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.41
2021-22 · Northeastern
-38.1% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

0%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
82%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#2268
Forward overall
#87
Forward born in 2001

D1 Comparables

NTDP-U18 · 2012-13 · 0.12 PPG
→ Boston College (0.72 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.13 PPG
→ Maine (0.28 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Army (0.23 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.19 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (0.34 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.07 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.27 D1 FR PPG)
0.04 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Connecticut College · 2022-23
0.191 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Fredonia · 2017-18
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Lawrence · 2014-15
0.375 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.