IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Daniel Olszewski Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1989-07-27 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2007-08 St. Louis Bandits NAHL 2 1 1 2 1.000 0.3552 0.3688 1.0499 1.0900
2008-09 St. Louis Bandits NAHL 38 7 6 13 0.342 0.1215 0.1201 0.3592 0.3551
2009-10 St. Louis Bandits NAHL 57 24 26 50 0.877 0.3116 0.2955 0.9210 0.8735
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2013-14 Wisconsin-Eau Claire D3 BigTen SR 22 5 12 17 0.773
2012-13 Wisconsin-Eau Claire D3 — JR 31 7 16 23 0.742
2011-12 Denver D1 WCHA-orig SO 9 0 0 0 0.000
2010-11 Denver D1 WCHA-orig FR 19 0 1 1 0.053
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.19
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.05
2010-11 · Denver
-72.7% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#19868
Forward overall
#664
Forward born in 1989
#1271
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Justin Parizek
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.93 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jonathan Davis
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.03 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Emil Romig
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ Denver (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.34 Developing
NCAAe PPG
T.J. Sarcona
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.06 PPG
→ Niagara (0.58 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Strong
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Brycon Johnson
Bryn Athyn · 2016-17
0.778 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Joey Martini
St. Scholastica · 2004-05
1.192 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Mike Egan
Babson · 2017-18
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.