← New Search ↗ Social Card

Adam Tisdale Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1998-11-09 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2014-15 Canmore Eagles AJHL 3 2 0 2 0.667 0.2236 0.2556 0.6170 0.7054
2015-16 Canmore Eagles AJHL 60 10 28 38 0.633 0.2124 0.2329 0.5861 0.6428
2016-17 Canmore Eagles AJHL 59 20 31 51 0.864 0.2899 0.3038 0.7999 0.8383
2017-18 Dubuque Fighting Saints USHL 50 18 15 33 0.660 0.3893 0.3817 1.9822 1.9436
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2023-24 Alaska Anchorage D1 WCHA 34 5 8 13 0.382
2022-23 Alaska Anchorage D1 WCHA 4 0 0 0 0.000
2021-22 Sacred Heart D1 AHA SR 27 2 5 7 0.259
2020-21 Sacred Heart D1 AHA JR 10 0 1 1 0.100
2019-20 Clarkson D1 ECAC SO 26 8 2 10 0.385
2018-19 Clarkson D1 ECAC FR 33 0 8 8 0.242
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.30
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.24
2018-19 · Clarkson
-19.2% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

80%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
20%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#14107
Forward overall
#643
Forward born in 1998

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.64 PPG
→ Michigan State (0.37 D1 FR PPG)
0.37 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.75 PPG
→ Boston University (0.77 D1 FR PPG)
0.43 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.56 PPG
→ Dartmouth (0.61 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.55 PPG
→ Clarkson (0.32 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.92 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.39 D1 FR PPG)
0.34 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Salem State · 2005-06
1.429 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Bryn Athyn · 2014-15
0.778 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Wilkes · 2015-16
1.423 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.