IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jack Nicoll Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1990-02-02 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2008-09 Wenatchee Wild NAHL 48 6 16 22 0.458 0.1684 0.1709 0.4837 0.4908
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2011-12 St. Olaf D3 MIAC JR 28 8 4 12 0.429
2010-11 St. Olaf D3 MIAC SO 19 0 1 1 0.053
2009-10 St. Olaf D3 MIAC FR 24 3 6 9 0.375
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.15
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.38
2009-10 · St. Olaf
+156.3% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#30809
Forward overall
#1126
Forward born in 1990
#2820
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

Seth Adams
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.26 PPG
→ Ferris State (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jeff Kubiak
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Cornell (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tim Lappin
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Brown (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Average
NCAAe PPG
Jordan Boucher
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Clarkson (0.28 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Mason Jobst
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.86 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Elite
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Niko Happo
Manhattanville · 2015-16
0.518 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Steven Wesley
Franklin Pierce · 2017-18
0.333 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Eric Bolden
Elmira · 2014-15
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.