IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Braden Kinnebrew Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1989-12-27 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2007-08 Trail Smoke Eaters BCHL 58 2 8 10 0.172 0.0664 0.0697 0.2509 0.2634
2008-09 — NAHL 55 5 13 18 0.327 0.1203 0.1214 0.3455 0.3488
2009-10 — NAHL 51 7 17 24 0.471 0.1729 0.1676 0.4967 0.4815
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2010-11 Castleton D3 LittleEast — 14 1 6 7 0.500
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.14
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.50
2010-11 · Castleton
+255.1% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#11567
Defenseman overall
#1262
Defenseman born in 1989

D1 Comparables

Taki Pantziris
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.29 PPG
→ Brown
0.15 No data
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Kirk
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.32 PPG
→ Dartmouth
0.17 No data
NCAAe PPG
Patrick Koudys
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ RPI (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Nolan Valleau
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.41 PPG
→ Bowling Green
0.22 No data
NCAAe PPG
Joseph Fiala
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.22 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Kevin Maisells
New England College · 2022-23
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Scott Voisin
SUNY Potsdam · 2007-08
0.700 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Neil Musselwhite
SUNY Oswego · 2005-06
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.