IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jon Schreiner Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1989-09-11 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2008-09 Fairbanks Ice Dogs NAHL 53 5 11 16 0.302 0.1109 0.1103 0.3187 0.3171
2009-10 Fairbanks Ice Dogs NAHL 53 3 12 15 0.283 0.1040 0.0993 0.2987 0.2852
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2013-14 Wisconsin-River Falls D3 BigTen SR 27 3 6 9 0.333
2012-13 Wisconsin-River Falls D3 BigTen JR 28 1 8 9 0.321
2011-12 Wisconsin-River Falls D3 BigTen SO 26 1 9 10 0.385
2010-11 Wisconsin-River Falls D3 BigTen FR 22 1 1 2 0.091
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.10
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.09
2010-11 · Wisconsin-River Falls
-7.2% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#14628
Defenseman overall
#1432
Defenseman born in 1989
#4747
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

William Eiserman
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Matt Krug
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Patrick Koudys
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ RPI (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Benjamin Gallacher
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Kirk
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.32 PPG
→ Dartmouth
0.17 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Matteo Peca
Post · 2021-22
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Ryan Parent
Alvernia · 2023-24
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Jason Atkinson
Castleton · 2021-22
0.320 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.