IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Joshua Miller Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1990-03-11 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2008-09 Traverse City North Stars NAHL 46 9 6 15 0.326 0.1158 0.1181 0.3424 0.3491
2009-10 — NAHL 43 8 9 17 0.395 0.1404 0.1375 0.4150 0.4065
2010-11 Motor City Metal Jackets NAHL 6 1 1 2 0.333 0.1184 0.1099 0.3499 0.3249
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2019-20 Fitchburg State D1 — FR 26 1 11 12 0.462
2019-20 Fitchburg State D3 — FR 26 1 11 12 0.462
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.10
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.46
2019-20 · Fitchburg State
+345.9% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#37438
Forward overall
#1361
Forward born in 1990
#3843
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Yasin Cissé
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
Will Suter
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Joe Gori
SUNY Plattsburgh · 2003-04
0.357 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Truman Landowski
Hamilton · 2012-13
0.591 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Jack Kelly
St. Norbert · 2017-18
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.