IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Dylan Porter Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1989-08-25 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2008-09 Owatonna Express NAHL 49 6 8 14 0.286 0.1050 0.1042 0.3016 0.2994
2009-10 Owatonna Express NAHL 57 7 15 22 0.386 0.1418 0.1350 0.4074 0.3880
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2013-14 St. Olaf D3 MIAC SR 27 3 3 6 0.222
2012-13 St. Olaf D3 MIAC JR 26 1 2 3 0.115
2011-12 St. Olaf D3 MIAC SO 28 4 3 7 0.250
2010-11 St. Olaf D3 MIAC FR 24 4 3 7 0.292
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.10
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.29
2010-11 · St. Olaf
+177.8% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#38991
Forward overall
#1282
Forward born in 1989
#4096
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Davey Middleton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Deresky
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ Bentley (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Cullen Hurley
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.21 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Raphael Lajeunesse
Southern Maine · 2021-22
0.294 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Colby Seitz
SUNY Cortland · 2021-22
0.957 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Kyle Haines
SUNY Cortland · 2007-08
0.818 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.