IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

T.J. Wees Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1990-01-21 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2008-09 Weyburn Red Wings SJHL 12 0 1 1 0.083 0.0213 0.0217 0.0628 0.0640
2009-10 Weyburn Red Wings SJHL 55 0 19 19 0.345 0.0885 0.0862 0.2604 0.2535
2010-11 Weyburn Red Wings SJHL 56 3 25 28 0.500 0.1281 0.1183 0.3769 0.3481
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2014-15 St. Norbert D3 NCHA — 3 0 0 0 0.000
2013-14 St. Norbert D3 NCHA — 11 0 1 1 0.091
2012-13 Lake Superior State D1 CCHA — 7 0 0 0 0.000
2011-12 Lake Superior State D1 CCHA — 5 0 0 0 0.000

NCAAe Rankings

#15785
Defenseman overall
#1625
Defenseman born in 1990
#1317
in SJHL

D1 Comparables

Michael Holland
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ RIT (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Carter Foguth
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.08 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.04 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Marc-Antoine Carrier
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Dominic Racobaldo
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Carlson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Danny Rock
SUNY Brockport · 2016-17
0.280 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Adam Young
Manhattanville · 2009-10
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Justin Derlago
Utica · 2014-15
0.417 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.