IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Brett Bower Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1990-07-05 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2009-10 Bismarck Bobcats NAHL 47 3 13 16 0.340 0.1209 0.1203 0.3591 0.3574
2010-11 — NAHL 52 6 14 20 0.385 0.1366 0.1290 0.4057 0.3831
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2014-15 St. Norbert D3 NCHA SR 9 0 3 3 0.333
2013-14 St. Norbert D3 NCHA JR 2 0 0 0 0.000
2012-13 St. Norbert D3 NCHA SO 5 1 0 1 0.200
2011-12 St. Norbert D3 NCHA FR 2 1 0 1 0.500
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.11
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.50
2011-12 · St. Norbert
+365.5% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#37652
Forward overall
#1367
Forward born in 1990
#3846
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Davey Middleton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Yasin Cissé
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Andrew Ciampichini
Elmira · 2010-11
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Andrew Mather
SUNY Oswego · 2007-08
0.308 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Cody Mastay
Arcadia · 2021-22
0.333 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.