IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Noah Prokop Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2000-01-15 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2017-18 Green Bay Gamblers USHL 56 7 12 19 0.339 0.2002 0.2081 1.0191 1.0595
2018-19 Green Bay Gamblers USHL 59 14 12 26 0.441 0.2600 0.2569 1.3236 1.3078
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2023-24 St. Thomas D1 CCHA — 27 3 5 8 0.296
2022-23 Colorado College D1 NCHC — 36 2 4 6 0.167
2021-22 Colorado College D1 NCHC — 26 1 2 3 0.115
2020-21 Nebraska Omaha D1 NCHC SO 24 0 0 0 0.000
2019-20 Nebraska Omaha D1 NCHC FR 27 2 2 4 0.148
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.20
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.15
2019-20 · Nebraska Omaha
-27.1% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

78%
NCAA D1
2%
NCAA D2/D3
20%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#22050
Forward overall
#1020
Forward born in 2000
#2154
in USHL

D1 Comparables

Blake Winiecki
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ St. Cloud State (0.29 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jeff Kubiak
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Cornell (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Mason Jobst
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.86 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Elite
NCAAe PPG
Austin Vieth
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.28 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Kenny Gillespie
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ RPI (0.20 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Josh Hechter
Saint Anselm · 2000-01
1.375 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Nicholas Stevens
Wisconsin-Stout · 2021-22
0.826 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Luke Moodie
SUNY Oswego · 2007-08
0.926 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.