IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jordan Gidaro Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1990-05-01 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2007-08 Burlington Cougars OJHL 36 21 28 49 1.361 0.3803 0.4022 0.9393 0.9933
2008-09 West Kelowna Warriors BCHL 33 8 9 17 0.515 0.2005 0.2055 0.7513 0.7701
2009-10 — OJHL 20 9 9 18 0.900 0.2515 0.2398 0.6211 0.5923
2010-11 Aurora Tigers OJHL 46 22 31 53 1.152 0.3219 0.2920 0.7951 0.7212
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2011-12 SUNY Plattsburgh D3 — FR 8 1 0 1 0.125
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.23
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.12
2011-12 · SUNY Plattsburgh
-46.1% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#16986
Forward overall
#718
Forward born in 1990
#1147
in OJHL

D1 Comparables

Davey Middleton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.29 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Clint Carlisle
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.78 PPG
→ Army (0.52 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Average
NCAAe PPG
Jordan Nelson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.34 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Bradley Duwe
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Alaska Anchorage (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Justin Parizek
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.93 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Aaron Leonard
Marian · 2010-11
0.538 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Kyle Gattelaro
Wisconsin-River Falls · 2013-14
0.893 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Tyler Leimbrock
SUNY Oswego · 2008-09
0.517 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.