| Season | Team | League | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG | NCAAe-PPG | Age-Adj | D3e-PPG | Age-Adj |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2001-02 | Tri-City Storm | USHL | 47 | 6 | 10 | 16 | 0.340 | 0.2008 | 0.2151 | 1.0191 | 1.0919 |
| 2002-03 | — | USHL | 59 | 10 | 7 | 17 | 0.288 | 0.1700 | 0.1716 | 0.8625 | 0.8706 |
| 2003-04 | Des Moines Buccaneers | USHL | 57 | 12 | 23 | 35 | 0.614 | 0.3622 | 0.3465 | 1.8382 | 1.7583 |
| 2004-05 | Des Moines Buccaneers | USHL | 12 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 0.250 | 0.1475 | 0.1337 | 0.7484 | 0.6782 |
| Season | School | Div | Conference | Year | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2007-08 | Wisconsin-River Falls | D3 | BigTen | SR | 27 | 23 | 13 | 36 | 1.333 |
| 2006-07 | Wisconsin-River Falls | D3 | BigTen | JR | 29 | 16 | 12 | 28 | 0.966 |
| 2005-06 | Wisconsin-River Falls | D3 | BigTen | SO | 27 | 13 | 13 | 26 | 0.963 |
How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.
Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.