← New Search ↗ Social Card

Patrick Borgestad Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1984-03-23 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2001-02 Tri-City Storm USHL 47 6 10 16 0.340 0.2008 0.2151 1.0191 1.0919
2002-03 USHL 59 10 7 17 0.288 0.1700 0.1716 0.8625 0.8706
2003-04 Des Moines Buccaneers USHL 57 12 23 35 0.614 0.3622 0.3465 1.8382 1.7583
2004-05 Des Moines Buccaneers USHL 12 1 2 3 0.250 0.1475 0.1337 0.7484 0.6782
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2007-08 Wisconsin-River Falls D3 BigTen SR 27 23 13 36 1.333
2006-07 Wisconsin-River Falls D3 BigTen JR 29 16 12 28 0.966
2005-06 Wisconsin-River Falls D3 BigTen SO 27 13 13 26 0.963
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.19
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.96
2005-06 · Wisconsin-River Falls
+414.1% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#23857
Forward overall
#698
Forward born in 1984
#2328
in USHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

SUNY Oswego · 2012-13
0.750 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Aurora · 2015-16
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
UMass Dartmouth · 2023-24
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.