IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Craig Lindegard Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1992-07-14 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2010-11 St. Cloud Norsemen NAHL 55 7 7 14 0.255 0.0935 0.0978 0.2686 0.2809
2011-12 St. Cloud Norsemen NAHL 57 13 19 32 0.561 0.2063 0.2056 0.5926 0.5905
2012-13 St. Cloud Norsemen NAHL 59 6 8 14 0.237 0.0872 0.0825 0.2505 0.2370
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2016-17 Wisconsin-Stout D3 BigTen SR 16 1 4 5 0.312
2015-16 Wisconsin-Stout D3 BigTen JR 28 3 11 14 0.500
2014-15 Wisconsin-Stout D3 BigTen SO 26 7 8 15 0.577
2013-14 Wisconsin-Stout D3 BigTen FR 23 6 3 9 0.391
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.11
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.39
2013-14 · Wisconsin-Stout
+246.9% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#39006
Forward overall
#1475
Forward born in 1992
#4100
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Yasin Cissé
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
Cullen Hurley
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.21 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Chad Watt
Stevenson · 2017-18
0.217 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Frankie Spellman
Endicott · 2015-16
0.364 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Aaron Spotts
St. Scholastica · 2005-06
0.346 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.