← New Search ↗ Social Card

Patrick Yudez Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1992-05-01 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2010-11 Wichita Falls Wildcats NAHL 56 5 3 8 0.143 0.0525 0.0544 0.1510 0.1564
2011-12 Wichita Falls Wildcats NAHL 43 8 10 18 0.419 0.1538 0.1517 0.4424 0.4363
2012-13 Wichita Falls Wildcats NAHL 42 6 9 15 0.357 0.1312 0.1228 0.3774 0.3533
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2015-16 Arizona State D1 NCHC — 0 0 0 0 0.000

NCAAe Rankings

#40811
Forward overall
#1532
Forward born in 1992
#4359
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Stevenson · 2015-16
0.458 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Wisconsin-Stout · 2015-16
0.222 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Western New England · 2023-24
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.