IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Nick Granowicz Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1998-03-28 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2016-17 Amarillo Wranglers NAHL 59 7 17 24 0.407 0.1495 0.1540 0.4294 0.4424
2017-18 Cedar Rapids RoughRiders USHL 28 3 6 9 0.321 0.1896 0.1800 0.9653 0.9166
2018-19 Merritt Centennials BCHL 58 32 27 59 1.017 0.3919 0.3595 1.4803 1.3578
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2023-24 UMass Lowell D1 HockeyEast — 25 4 4 8 0.320
2022-23 Michigan D1 BigTen SR 36 4 6 10 0.278
2021-22 Michigan D1 BigTen JR 19 1 3 4 0.210
2020-21 Michigan D1 BigTen SO 25 5 6 11 0.440
2019-20 Michigan D1 BigTen FR 21 7 4 11 0.524
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.25
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.52
2019-20 · Michigan
+112.7% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

57%
NCAA D1
2%
NCAA D2/D3
35%
Age-Out / Club
5%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#12467
Forward overall
#565
Forward born in 1998

D1 Comparables

Carlos Amestoy
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.75 PPG
→ Maine
0.39 No data
NCAAe PPG
David Goodwin
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.67 PPG
→ Penn State (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Average
NCAAe PPG
Jordan Nelson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Todd Skirving
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.80 PPG
→ RIT (0.65 D1 FR PPG)
0.43 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Dylan Walchuk
WHL · 2012-13 · 0.86 PPG
→ Northern Michigan (0.42 D1 FR PPG)
0.37 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

A.J. Shiverdecker
Westfield State · 2007-08
1.208 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Danny Liscio
SUNY Morrisville · 2014-15
1.083 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Chad Anderson
Norwich · 2006-07
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.