IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Kevin Becker Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1993-02-20 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2011-12 Aberdeen Wings NAHL 55 8 20 28 0.509 0.1870 0.1920 0.5374 0.5517
2012-13 — NAHL 56 8 15 23 0.411 0.1509 0.1473 0.4335 0.4233
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2016-17 Saint John's D3 MIAC SR 14 4 2 6 0.429
2015-16 Saint John's D3 MIAC JR 27 6 12 18 0.667
2014-15 Saint John's D3 MIAC SO 25 4 9 13 0.520
2013-14 Saint John's D3 MIAC FR 23 6 7 13 0.565
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.14
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.57
2013-14 · Saint John's
+299.7% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#31317
Forward overall
#1070
Forward born in 1993
#2901
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

Tayler Munson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Average
NCAAe PPG
Stanislav Dzakhov
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.27 PPG
→ Niagara (0.44 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Average
NCAAe PPG
Alexander Dahl
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ben Ostlie
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Notre Dame
0.13 No data
NCAAe PPG
Gage Hough
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.39 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Sean Perichak
SUNY Cortland · 2014-15
0.600 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Jayson Alegria
Bowdoin · 2023-24
0.762 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Thomas Sansone
Johnson & Wales · 2017-18
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.