IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Davis Dekorte Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1993-03-15 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2011-12 — NAHL 35 5 4 9 0.257 0.1019 0.1049 0.2699 0.2779
2012-13 — NAHL 54 7 15 22 0.407 0.1614 0.1581 0.4277 0.4190
2013-14 — NAHL 60 8 15 23 0.383 0.1519 0.1412 0.4024 0.3740
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2017-18 Lake Forest D3 NCHA SR 27 3 7 10 0.370
2016-17 Lake Forest D3 NCHA JR 22 2 3 5 0.227
2015-16 Lake Forest D3 NCHA SO 18 2 2 4 0.222
2014-15 Lake Forest D3 NCHA FR 7 2 0 2 0.286
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.13
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.29
2014-15 · Lake Forest
+125.5% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#37803
Forward overall
#1341
Forward born in 1993
#3979
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Yasin Cissé
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
Will Suter
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Davey Middleton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Matt McNair
Adrian · 2015-16
0.379 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Mason Emoff
Manhattanville · 2018-19
0.312 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Luke Dietsch
Augsburg · 2014-15
0.593 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.