IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Doug Rose Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1993-08-12 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2011-12 Fairbanks Ice Dogs NAHL 46 2 7 9 0.196 0.0719 0.0755 0.2066 0.2170
2012-13 Fairbanks Ice Dogs NAHL 52 10 18 28 0.538 0.1978 0.1978 0.5684 0.5685
2013-14 Fairbanks Ice Dogs NAHL 57 7 27 34 0.597 0.2192 0.2082 0.6296 0.5981
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2017-18 Stevenson D3 MAC — 26 7 8 15 0.577
2016-17 Stevenson D3 MAC — 26 2 11 13 0.500
2015-16 Neumann D3 MAC — 25 3 7 10 0.400
2014-15 Neumann D3 MAC — 24 8 8 16 0.667
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.19
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.67
2014-15 · Neumann
+246.2% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#7101
Defenseman overall
#995
Defenseman born in 1993
#2564
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

Benjamin Gallacher
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
Matt Krug
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
William Eiserman
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Dominic Racobaldo
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Carlson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Trevor Bayda
St. Norbert · 2002-03
0.467 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Emil Elias
New England College · 2024-25
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Tyler Samodral
Chatham · 2023-24
0.593 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.