IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Matt Lanzillotti Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1992-08-06 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2011-12 Kalamazoo Jr. K-Wings NAHL 50 1 5 6 0.120 0.0441 0.0441 0.1267 0.1266
2012-13 Jamestown Ironmen NAHL 53 2 9 11 0.207 0.0762 0.0723 0.2190 0.2079
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2016-17 Johnson & Wales D3 CNE SR 26 2 7 9 0.346
2015-16 Johnson & Wales D3 CNE JR 26 4 6 10 0.385
2014-15 Johnson & Wales D3 CNE SO 23 5 7 12 0.522
2013-14 Johnson & Wales D3 CNE FR 27 4 9 13 0.481
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.06
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.48
2013-14 · Johnson & Wales
+735.9% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#22437
Defenseman overall
#2087
Defenseman born in 1992
#6176
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

William Eiserman
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Matt Krug
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Carlson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Dominic Racobaldo
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Patrick Koudys
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ RPI (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Matthew Mueller
Morrisville · 2023-24
0.333 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Nicholas Hawkins
Hamilton · 2018-19
0.308 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Myles Yearwood
Elmira · 2023-24
0.250 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.