IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Kyle Haak Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1994-08-06 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2011-12 Traverse City North Stars NAHL 5 1 3 4 0.800 0.2970 0.3265 0.8470 0.9312
2012-13 Aberdeen Wings NAHL 57 5 20 25 0.439 0.1629 0.1709 0.4644 0.4873
2013-14 Aberdeen Wings NAHL 58 14 27 41 0.707 0.2625 0.2623 0.7485 0.7478
2014-15 Aberdeen Wings NAHL 60 19 35 54 0.900 0.3342 0.3164 0.9529 0.9021
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2018-19 Air Force D1 AHA SR 35 12 11 23 0.657
2017-18 Air Force D1 AHA JR 29 7 5 12 0.414
2016-17 Air Force D1 AHA SO 41 14 19 33 0.805
2015-16 Air Force D1 AHA FR 36 9 10 19 0.528
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.25
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.53
2015-16 · Air Force
+109.2% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#12561
Forward overall
#515
Forward born in 1994
#752
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

Beau Walker
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ Sacred Heart (0.40 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Average
NCAAe PPG
Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jayson Angus
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.66 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Emil Romig
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ Denver (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Cody Marooney
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Andrew Romano
SUNY Geneseo · 2015-16
0.963 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Beau Orser
SUNY Oswego · 2012-13
0.714 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Paul Boutoussov
Salve Regina · 2016-17
0.724 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.