IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Patrick Thompson Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1993-01-21 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2011-12 — NAHL 12 1 1 2 0.167 0.0592 0.0605 0.1758 0.1798
2012-13 — NAHL 54 10 9 19 0.352 0.1250 0.1215 0.3712 0.3609
2013-14 Soo Eagles NAHL 9 0 1 1 0.111 0.0395 0.0364 0.1172 0.1081
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2017-18 Salve Regina D3 CNE SR 30 7 15 22 0.733
2016-17 Salve Regina D3 CNE JR 25 13 7 20 0.800
2015-16 Salve Regina D3 CNE SO 27 13 6 19 0.704
2014-15 Salve Regina D3 CNE FR 24 3 4 7 0.292
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.06
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.29
2014-15 · Salve Regina
+383.7% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#44873
Forward overall
#1658
Forward born in 1993
#4952
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tayler Munson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Average
NCAAe PPG
Stanislav Dzakhov
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.27 PPG
→ Niagara (0.44 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Average
NCAAe PPG
Ben Ostlie
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Notre Dame
0.13 No data
NCAAe PPG
William Messa
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Northeastern
0.12 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Nigel Nelson
Milwaukee School of Engineering · 2018-19
0.364 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Tyler Starke
Augsburg · 2003-04
0.191 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Kody Collins
New England · 2008-09
0.174 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.