| Season | Team | League | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG | NCAAe-PPG | Age-Adj | D3e-PPG | Age-Adj |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2015-16 | Granite City Lumberjacks | NA3HL | 5 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.200 | 0.0241 | 0.0256 | — | — |
| 2016-17 | Amarillo Wranglers | NAHL | 54 | 7 | 5 | 12 | 0.222 | 0.0825 | 0.0842 | 0.2353 | 0.2401 |
| 2017-18 | Amarillo Wranglers | NAHL | 60 | 5 | 10 | 15 | 0.250 | 0.0928 | 0.0901 | 0.2647 | 0.2571 |
| 2018-19 | — | NAHL | 54 | 7 | 9 | 16 | 0.296 | 0.1100 | 0.1019 | 0.3137 | 0.2906 |
| Season | School | Div | Conference | Year | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-22 | Milwaukee School of Engineering | D3 | NCHA | JR | 27 | 4 | 5 | 9 | 0.333 |
| 2020-21 | Milwaukee School of Engineering | D3 | — | SO | 19 | 3 | 6 | 9 | 0.474 |
| 2019-20 | Milwaukee School of Engineering | D3 | — | FR | 22 | 4 | 4 | 8 | 0.364 |
How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.
Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.